Showing posts with label COVID-19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COVID-19. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2020

Where is the Church: Jesus, Christians, and COVID-19? Blog #3: The Least of These



       The third blog, entitled, The Least of These uses words from Matthew 25:40. “And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.” Before these words are spoken, Jesus tells two parables, one about Ten Virgins, whose message is about preparation. The second parable tells the story of the Ten Talents. This second parable’s message is about investment, stewardship of “the master’s resources.” Immediately before the quote regarding the least of these is the story, sometimes called “The Final Judgement.” In the Final Judgement, those who cared for the hungry, naked, and imprisoned will be judged as having fed, clothed, and visited Jesus. The one who ministered to Jesus are called righteous and have eternal life as their reward.

            I believe Jesus would categorize the least of these, which typically includes the homeless, children, and the elderly has grown to include those with compromised immune systems. Economic challenges that are a consequence of shelter-in orders add to this list, the furloughed, and those working in so-called essential industries. This list, I am sure, is much more extensive than this.  As mentioned in my first blog, within these identified groups of people to whom we minister are sub-groups who are systemically oppressed. This adds additional layers to their suffering.

A pandemic such as this exposes and exacerbates the social disparities that have plagued and continue to plague our society--pun intended!”[1] New sources have identified multiples ways that there have been unequal and inequitable responses to the pandemic. An earlier blog has also identified the ways the pandemic has been used to justify increased oppression. This statement is exemplified in the events that have occurred since stay-at-home orders have been issued.

I am not to saying that there aren’t and haven’t been efforts to feed, clothe, and welcome. I am arguing that while it is easier to tend to physical needs, what is often forgotten is the attention to systemic injustices that causes the needs in the first place. If our country had been considering its preparedness for a pandemic like the Ten Virgins, we would not be making heart-breaking decisions about who is provided with a ventilator and who isn’t. If we had been better stewards of our knowledge and resources, perhaps those working essential jobs would have the items that would keep them safe from infection. When Jesus said in Mark 14, “the poor you will always have with you,” he was referring to this tendency. He was identifying that the poor will always be present because of the institutional reasons for their poverty will always be present.

The parables that proceeded the story of the final judgment are apropos. They tell stories about preparedness and about stewardship. These two items are vital if we are to care about and for the “least of these.” The pandemic has shed a spotlight on who the least of these might be. It is up to God’s people, the body of the Church to step up and to minister. By minister, I mean to go beyond the material. I call for the Body of Christ to be active in working so that the new normal will be one in which justice reigns and we don’t need to feed, to free, or to clothe because everyone has enough to eat and clean water to drink. The poor won’t be with us because the poor do not exist; all resources are distributed equitably.  


[1] Demian Wheeler, email Message to Yolanda Y. Williams, April 22, 2020.

Where is the Church: Jesus, Christians, and COVID-19? Blog #2: Freedom



            In the previous blog, I spoke about the Church's response to the othering that has been a result of COVID-19 orders and recommendations. In this blog, I want to respond to the use of the term, freedom as an argument to disavow orders and recommendations put in place to flatten the curve on virus infections. Reports from news sources have documented protests in Wisconsin, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina, Utah, Western New York state and Washington, and Pennsylvania

The New York Times reports, "…at least 316 million people in at least 42 states, three counties, ten cities, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico are being urged to stay home."[1] 

For some, the issue is concern personal freedoms and the government's intrusion into those rights. 
If I get sick, then I am going to bear the consequences of my getting sick. If anybody else gets sick, they bear the consequences of their free choice without government coercion to do so. That's what this is about.[2]
           Interestingly, we, at least most of us, do not argue against the government's intrusions that make illegal murder. By limiting one person's freedom to murder, you save a potential victim or victims. The same would be true for other crimes. The argument I am presenting here is that our government restricts the personal freedoms of others all of the time for the sake of all members of society. The intriguing questions asked by Damato are, "What kinds of communicable diseases function to void one's right of free movement? How deadly does the disease have to be? How contagious?"[3] These questions are not about whether or not freedoms should be impinged upon, but concern who, what, why, and when should determine personal freedom should be restricted.

            There are more than 100 verses in the Bible talking about freedom. The call of God's representative is to proclaim freedom.[4] One of the purposes of Jesus' life, death, and resurrection was to offer freedom.[5]  The writers of the Psalms and the Epistles identify freedom as one of the gifts and characteristics of the faithful.[6] This makes it clear that freedom is not just an American value. It is a value of the Triune God. 

            Freedom for most is experienced in mobility, and the ability to live life on one's own terms. The Bible appears to differ with this definition. The letter to the Galatians reads, "For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another."[7]  Jesus used his personal freedom as ways to confront and to right injustices. In this way, freedom is not to serve the individual; freedom is to serve the community. Our freedom is to be exercised to provide grace. Our exercises of personal freedom are always to be focused on delivering the invitation and welcome discussed in the previous blog. 

I exercise my personal freedom to cover my face with a mask, to eat and socialize at home, not because I might be sick or they might be sick, but because this distance offers grace to both of us. I chose to follow the rules of personal distancing because it is in this exercise of my personal freedom that I reflect the love of God, self, and neighbor. As a Methodist, my practice of personal freedom is informed by three simple rules, Do No Harm. Do Good. Stay in love with God.[8]




[1] Vanessa Swales, Patricia Mazzei, and Baker Baker, “See Which States and Cities Have Told Residents to Stay at Home,” The New York Times (New York, April 20, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-stay-at-home-order.html.
[2] CNN, “Protests Erupt Again over Coronavirus Shelter-in-Place Orders. Here’s Why Some Governors Aren’t Budging,” Newsdesk@CBS58.Com (Milwaukee, April 20, 2020).
[3] David S. Damato, “Civil Liberties Under Attack During COVID-19.”
[4] Isaiah 61
[5] John 8:32
[6] Isaiah, 61. Gal. 2, 4, 5, and 8, 2 Cor. 3: 17, Rom. 8, 1 Peter 2:16, Ephesians 2:8
[7] Galatians 5:13 ESV
[8] Rueben P. Job, Three Simple Rules (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2010).

Where is the Church: Jesus, Christians, and COVID-19?



Jesus and Social Distancing


            This blog partially fulfills the required coursework for TR5001 Public Theology. The course taught by Dr. Demian Wheeler is offered at United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities in St. Paul, MN. The blog having multiple parts will share my thoughts and provide theological support on exploring the question, "Where is the Church in COVID-19."

           Social distancing is an unfortunate term. Though it makes a great sound bite, it is too reminiscent of our histories of "othering" and the tragedies perpetrated in the name of social distancing. I suppose physical distancing as a motto was just not sexy enough. It does not roll off the tongue as easily as social distancing. While recent commercials and public service announcements have attempted to clarify social distancing as the recommended six-feet distance between people, the term has already caught on. Fueling the sense that we are distancing ourselves socially, is the fact that restaurants are bars are closed to eat-in and drink-in traffic. The truth is that something else is also occurring socially, and by socially, I mean societally and culturally.

Social distancing, while well-meaning, has had adverse effects. One would expect covering one's face to have an equalizing impact on the population. This has not been true in the United States. This is because everything, and I mean everything in the United States, is filtered through its system of otherism.[1] Otherism relegates a human being to a non-person status.
People, already treated as others and hypervisible because of skin tone and facial features, have been made even more visible by orders to "shelter in." Othered people with so-called Asian features have become targets for violence. Othered Black and Brown people, more visible because they work in essential industries, are targeted both for wearing masks and for refusing to wear a mask. All are more susceptible to becoming infected because they work in industries not currently set up to allow for six-foot distances between workers and because they also live in neighborhoods not always provided with adequate access to health services.

            Jesus also lived in a time in which otherism was systemic. Otherism was practiced as a part of religious purity and socially. Strict rules existed regarding with whom to socialize and who to touch and not to touch. The stories of Jesus' ministry recorded in the Gospels tell us that Jesus broke the rules of social distancing, whether enacted to provide religious purity or enacted as a part of societal distancing. Many of the charges leveled against Jesus included his habit of being in the presence of sinful people. The writers of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke record the Pharisees questioning Jesus' practice of socially interacting with tax collectors and sinners.[2] Jesus' habit was to confront otherism by offering others' seats at his table, by inviting them into to be in close contact with him, by using them as examples of Godly living, and by physically touching them.[3]

Jesus does not break these rules of societal distancing because he is an anarchist. Jesus believes in following rules (Mk. 12:17), but Jesus makes it clear that there are religious and systemic practices that are wrong. The ruler used to determine that practices are wrong is when a practice is used to deny others access to the community, to grace, and God. Additionally, Jesus' actions argue that the effect criminalizing an individual, a group, or a practice or of using the label sinner denies a person access to the same living conditions, economic benefits, healthcare, and mobility enjoyed by the so-called holy. I submit by breaking specific laws of purity, Jesus was arguing that when religious laws create hierarchies and power structures that deny access to grace, those laws are neither holy nor do they provide a path to purity. I further submit that when our holy practices are used to deny access to grace, those who practice purity become less holy than those who they have identified as sinners.

           There was a point being made by Jesus' choices to break purity laws that advocated social distancing. The point being made is not about washing hands, maintaining a distance of 6-feet between you and non-household members, or not participating in groups of more than ten. Jesus is advocating the evaluation and re-evaluation of systemic societal distancing that separate our society into haves and have nots, insiders and outsiders, the holy and the holy, the touchable, and the untouchable.

This evaluation and re-evaluation of our systemic ways of social distancing are essential for those of us in religious settings. As religious leaders, our talk is often peppered with wide-eyed statements using the terms radical welcome and invitation. What is often missed in the living out of our sound bite commitments is an intense conversation about systemic social distancing that prevents radical welcome or invitation. Perhaps we should begin with the revelation to the Apostle Peter in the book of Acts, chapter 10. Through visions and face-to-face experiences, Peter discovered that followers of Christ should not call anything that God has created, unclean. I would extend this interpretation to include not just anything but anyone God has created.

The Church, in my opinion, has been mostly silent on justice in ministering in this season of COVID-19. Most congregations have been preoccupied with how to stream their worship services and how to recover lost income due to the lack of face-to-face contact with financial supporters. Yet, it is the Church that is uniquely called to live out the ministry of Jesus. Loving God with all of our hearts, souls, and strength, and our neighbor as ourselves[4]  is antithetical to criminalizing and denying others access to the good things our country has to offer.
I will admit efforts to make and distribute masks is a wonderful endeavor, but there is much, much more that needs to be done. Letters and phone calls need to be made to our leaders in government and our police department superintendents. The retailers and those in power in transportation need to be called out for practicing otherism. This is precisely the time when the Church needs to use its voice and ability to call for justice. We have the time. We have the means. What's left now is the courage to use our influence to right the wrongs of society. The Church needs to stop complaining and worrying about its survival and start prioritizing the survival of God's creation, humans, included, just like Jesus did.





[1] Joel Snell, “Otherism,” Education 138, no. 3 (2018): 271.
[2] Matthew 9:10-17, Mark 2:15-22, Luke 5:29-39 NIV
[3] Some examples are found in Mt. 8, 12, 14, 21, Luke 4, 5, 6, 9, Mark 3, 6
[4] Deuteronomy 6:4-7, Matthew 22:37-40,Mark 12:30-31,Luke 10:27